municipal refuse; solid waste management plans; regional districts; operational Panel: Waste Management Act, 1996 - ss. quarterly sampling to monthly sampling during the June to September storm season However, the Panel held that Mr. Keays' argument was insufficient to give him standing under the Act. Waste Management Act 2003 An Act relating to waste management and funding for waste management operations and for related purposes. Given this finding, the Board did not deal with the issue of balance of convenience. The Board noted that there was a substantial delay between the Deputy Director’s decision and the Applicant’s notice of appeal, no reason was given for this delay, and Metalex opposed the extension. Balance of convenience; irreparable harm; stay order. Operational Certificate 7577 to Wastech and the Village of Cache Creek. PCEPA appealed on the basis that, given the findings of fact made in the decision, much more stringent monitoring requirements were required. The Board found that there was a serious issue to be tried but that Alpha did not show that it would suffer irreparable harm if the stay was refused. It required the landowners to conduct a site investigation, submit a technical report of their results within three months of the Order, and to submit a plan for remediation within five months. Mr. Goggins and Mr. Fleischer filed separate appeals against a Permit amended by the Deputy Director of Waste Management.

However, acknowledging that other members of FSV may be affected, the Board invited any aggrieved member of the FSV to be a party in the Metalex appeal on behalf of the FSV.

The Waste Management Phoenix Open isn’t just a legendary golf tournament—it’s also a 700,000 participant experiment in sustainability and zero waste. – ss.

The Appellants appealed the decision of the Deputy Director of Waste Management, upholding the issuance of a permit to the Corporation of the Village of Kaslo (the ‘Village’) for the discharge of waste from a package treatment plant into Kootenay Lake. WASTE MANAGEMENT AMENDMENT ACT, 1993.

The Panel noted the past history of the landfill concerning unexpected gas Keywords:

The Board found that the Ministry of Environment bore the responsibility for consulting with any aboriginal groups whose rights could be affected by a waste discharge permit. the monitoring requirements in the storm water management plan be upgraded from Waste Management Act - ss. v. Assistant Regional Waste Manager (MB Paper Limited, Third Party), 97-WAS-09(a) Gurmeet Brar Mr. Goggins argued that he was an Appellant to the original Permit before the Deputy Director where his standing to appeal was not challenged. This decision has been varied by Cabinet in The Resort appealed the decision on the grounds that the Deputy Director should not have required their waste disposal system be a part of a regional liquid waste management plan (a ‘LWMP’) being created. Waste Management Act is to protect the environment, and that given Mr. Bianco’s history, the Order was appropriate. Balance of convenience; irreparable harm. ,random a fourth stage for the landfill. Toby Vigod, Harry Higgins, Elizabeth Keay. Panel: 94/38); secondary treatment plant; CAM program; multiport diffuser; environmental protection; security bond. Mr. Goggins and Mr. Keays filed separate appeals against an Amended Permit issued by the Assistant Regional Waste Manager authorizing an additional discharge of contaminants to the air from a new boiler at the pulp and paper mill in Powell River of MB Paper Limited (the Permit Holder). On the evidence presented, the Board found that a trench burner system would protect the environment better than the proposed air assisted open burning. Metalex has appealed this decision to the Board and Mr. Wilkin, on behalf of himself and Friends of the Similkameen Valley (‘FSV’), applies to the Board for an extension of time so that he and FSV may also appeal the decision. Further, the Board found that on the evidence presented, the environmental impact of a single application of deposited sludge was minimal and its removal may cause a greater environmental impact than leaving it in place. Panel: - s.43, s.45(3); purpose of appeal period. 44, 46(2); Environment Management Act - ss. Key Words: Keywords: Waste Management Act - ss. This issue of standing is the same as that considered by the Board in John Keays and Paddy Goggins v. Assistant Regional Waste Manager (MB Paper Ltd., Third Party) (Environmental Appeal Board, On the issue of fettered discretion, the Panel found that the Regional Waste Manager, and subsequently the Deputy Director, had not fettered their discretion when setting permit levels or monitoring requirements. Katherine Hough, Helmut Klughammer, Jack Lapin. Waste Management Act - s. 44, 48. Certificate and attached plans be clarified, and that the Regional Manager The Deputy Director indicated, however, that he would recommend issuance of a permit for a commercially available trench burner for a 5 year period. certificate; landfill gas; protection of the environment. Panel: On a balance of convenience, Metalex should be granted a temporary stay of the deadlines. - s.8, s.9; air assisted open burning; trench burning. This was an appeal against a decision of the Deputy Director of Waste - s.5; spray irrigation. in Appeal No. "W�Bʳ�M��(�ŋ�ɷ���������a8���ۼ�ڻ����ٗ/o�>��������ɡ���y;�s�z��ds|s54��"�+�O5̸jQ�k�Ul��&[�����WĪ��� 'N6�l�����+ƣ�^1�d�dv�����������f'�\0�`r���I��NB:wS��;`쒱K�.����Bk�� Z�,L��ܼ����a�a8��du�cu�{������:K�''=���9B����F�n8;�~ܼ< f�h���������ԌRH�q��dIa�����;�P���6�GBڼ�^ؽpa������������&{�`�'�� by the Panel to address its concerns about landfill gas. The Board also found that the threat of toxic leachate and of slope failure, which could result in damage to two natural gas pipelines which cross the site, created a significant risk to the environment. Since the City had been exercising its rights under the permit for 16 years, the Board did not grant an extension of the time to appeal the issuance of the permit. The Panel set aside the directions in the Deputy Director's decision but held that more effective monitoring was justified to protect the environment, adopting the monitoring program submitted by the MELP. However, it required King Coho Resort to give a security bond to the Regional Waste Manager, the amount of which would increase as the volume of effluent increased with the growth of the development. The Board found that the Deputy Director erred in requiring the Resort to develop a LWMP before a permit could be issued. Keywords: The Panel also found The sewage system predates any applicable legislation. v. Alpha Manufacturing Inc. et al. A Pollution Prevention Order was issued to Metalex Products Ltd. (‘Metalex’) ordering it to stop dumping slag at the Dankoe Mine and to remove the existing slag pile. The Appellant landowners applied for a stay of Pollution Abatement and Pollution Prevention Order OS-14991 pending its appeal. (1996), (BCSC). v. Deputy Director of Waste Management Certificate and the attached plans to include several requirements recommended - ss. and Paddy Goggins v. The Deputy Director of Waste Management stayed part of a Pollution Prevention Order issued to Metalex which required Metalex to remove, by September 15, 1996, a slag pile at an abandoned mine site near Cawston, B.C., pending a risk assessment. Louisiana Pacific Canada Ltd. and the Peace Country Environmental Protection Association (PCEPA) appealed a decision of the Deputy Director allowing an appeal against an amended permit. 18(5), 21; landfill; solid He submitted that any mishap in the handling of the wastes under the authorization of the permit would prejudice him, his children, and his property, and that he was therefore a "person aggrieved" under the Act. The tripartite American Cyanamid test was applied. Acronym Finder, All Rights Reserved. 97-WAS-10(b), dated December In addition to the terms of the original operating permit, the Certificate Bob Radloff, Joan Rysavy, Jack Lapin. some of the Appellant’s specific concerns.

The Board further held that Mr. Wilkin is not an ‘aggrieved person’ under the Waste Management Act, as he resides 75 kilometers from the mine site and has no rights or interests which may be prejudicially affected by the Deputy Director’s decision.

The Zorns argued that their appeal was against a decision contained in a May 22, 1997 letter, which allowed the City of Cranbrook to burn wood waste at the landfill. BCWMA stands for British Columbia Waste Management Act of 1992 (Canada) Suggest new definition. David Perry, Harry Higgins and Elizabeth Keay, M.D. The extension was refused. The Board noted that the 21 day time limit to appeal gives those potentially affected sufficient time to challenge the permit, while acknowledging that the permittee should be able to plan its affairs with some certainty. Keywords: Examples: NFL, As Mr. Granberg’s water and sewage system provides an essential service for over 80 families and the lot was considered marginal, the Board found that it was necessary for his activities to be properly regulated by the Ministry. The Panel accepted that Mr. Goggins was a "person aggrieved" under the Act, and that his appeal would therefore proceed. Management upholding the decision of the Regional Waste Manager to issue The expense of a trench burner is one of the consequences of adapting to the new reality of reducing the effects of pollution. To require lay people to essentially "prove" their standing by showing how they will or will likely be affected is to impose an unreasonable burden on them. Further, the Board found that the Campbell River Indian Band was not properly consulted during the original permitting and appeal processes, but that this was corrected by the efforts of the Environmental Appeal Board to involve the Band in the process.

odours, and would not adequately protect the environment. Keywords: Operational Certificate, but directed the Regional Manager to take into account The environment could suffer irreparable harm if a stay is not granted and the amount of discharge is later found by the Board to be unsafe. The Board held that the purpose of the Alpha Manufacturing Inc. (‘Alpha’) requested a stay of a Pollution Prevention Order issued by the Deputy Director of Waste Management, pending its appeal. The Board was satisfied that the Appellants established an adequate reason for their delay in filing an appeal. The Board found that, in challenging the legal standing of the Appellants, the Permit Holder took an overly narrow approach to the question of standing. 96/30 Louisiana Pacific Canada Ltd., Peace Country Environmental He claimed that refusing the stay and allowing the increase in discharge would result in irreparable environmental harm. The Deputy Director of Waste Management stayed part of a Pollution Prevention Order issued to Metalex which required Metalex to remove, by September 15, 1996, a slag pile at an abandoned mine site near Cawston, B.C., pending a risk assessment. He also asked that an interim stay of the Amended Permit be granted pending the outcome of the appeal in order to protect the environment and the health of himself, his family, and the general community. The Board noted that the terms of the Order were only a continuation and expansion of the monitoring and Site Closure requirements contained in Alpha’s cancelled permit and that these costs would have to be incurred at some point in any event.

Waste Management Act, 1982 - ss. Katherine Hough, Helmut Klughammer, Jack Lapin. �0� A U������W�\^%\�BP��O X+B�0��ᦸ����-8���k����j����*"����v!�fA��+�\$ "h�G��� i�aF�j���Z $*�%� �]�K�� J�Il�@�"� �4q@N�������4 The Order also required the terms of reference for the assessment to be approved by the Regional Manager before the assessment was started.