By the same token the claim has far less plausibility when membership of the upper house is determined in the same way as membership of the lower house, i.e., by direct election. A bicameral legislature is not good for passing bills in times of emergency because of delays that result from having two chambers. Many legislators have to go through the bills before they are passed or carried out. This page was last modified on 12 February 2017, at 16:09. Weak can never forgive, forgiveness is the attribute of the ... Human beings should be treated as 'ends' and not as 'means', Population Growth - Boon or Bane to India's growth, Creative & Abstract Topics for Group Discussion, Ethical & Social topics for Group Discussion. A bicameral legislature is a legislature with two houses or chambers, such as the Parliament of the United Kingdom (composed of the House of Commons and the House of Lords) or the Congress of the United States (composed of the House of Representatives and the Senate). Courtesy holistic policies, industry or commerce and the economy can grow parallel to the social programs meant for the poor or underprivileged. Thus, the power of the legislature has been enhanced considerably. By having every denomination represented through the larger lower house, whether it is House of Commons or House of Representatives, even the last hamlet with its last citizen can be represented. The policies made by the elite are often seen and also turn out to be in favor of the elite. For discussion of other aspects of bicameralism see Bicameralism and democracy. This claim would seem to be particularly plausible when members of the upper house are appointed rather than elected and/or chosen from panels of those who have already distinguished themselves in public life (as is the case with, e.g., the Irish Seanad ). Representative Democracy While neither the upper house nor the lower house gets a free run to pass any laws they feel like and a balance is attained by compelling the houses to reach a consensus, this can lead to policy deadlocks. Like all forms of governance or government, there are some substantial bicameralism pros and cons. Holistic Policies The process may be even slower when the bicameral system requires proposed legislation not only to be scrutinised but to be approved by both houses so that amendments proposed by the second house are referred back to the first house for its approval. In a unicameral legislature, it is quite possible that some people or some sections will not have true representation and may be excluded from the focuses of lawmakers. This rationale may be elaborated in various ways. Representative Democracy Like the British House of Commons and House of Lords or the Senate and the House of Representatives in the United States, many countries have adopted bicameralism or a bicameral legislature. The upper House of Lords represents a smaller, more elite social class, while the lower House of Commons represents a larger, less-exclusive class. The lower house can block legislature that it deems unfit or unsuitable given their interests and goals. There are many differences of detail between bicameral legislatures – e.g., in the nature of each chamber (its size, the composition of its membership, etc.) The upper house can block policies that don’t suit their endgame. However, many national legislatures enhance the value of scrutiny in a second chamber by having membership of this chamber determined in a different way from membership of the first (e.g., by appointment rather than election), the rationale being that the second chamber may consider proposed legislation from a different point of view and give weight to legitimate interests or concerns which the first chamber has failed to consider. The great variety of bicameral legislatures makes it difficult to draw any general conclusions – save to say that, except when, e.g., a system produces legislative deadlock or slows the passage of legislation which needs approval as a matter of urgency, the advantage of a bicameral system in offering greater legislative scrutiny outweighs the disadvantage of its relative slowness: that the legislative outcome should be as good as possible matters more than the swiftness of the legislative process. Far too much lobbying is invested in. This can sometimes lead to proposed legislation being ‘shuttled’ between the two houses, as amendments approved by one house are referred back to the other house, which makes fresh amendments, which in turn require the approval of the second house, and so on. List of Pros of Bicameralism. In some countries there are regions with particular interests or concerns which may be unlikely to receive adequate consideration in the lower house – perhaps these regions are sparsely populated and so have no more than minimal representation in the lower house.

2.

1. For instance, the Rajya Sabha in India has 12 nominated members with repute in the fields of art, science, literature and social service.

Pros of Unicameral legislature . Lobbying & Wastage of Funds