The motor vehicle exemption does apply to components of gasoline (e.g., benzene); lubricants and oils; and antifreeze used to maintain and operate a motor vehicle employed at the facility. These chemicals would not be subject to threshold determinations for reporting under EPCRA section 313, and would not be subject to release and other waste management reporting unless an activity threshold is exceeded elsewhere at the facility. The motor vehicle maintenance exemption applies only to the otherwise use of EPCRA section 313 chemicals.

Can this fuel be considered exempt under the ‘maintenance of motor vehicles used at the facility’ exemption? Except for the emergency notification requirements of section 304, EPCRA does not apply to the transportation of EPCRA section 313 chemicals. For example, this exemption would not apply in the case of an automobile manufacturing plant. Except for the emergency notification requirements of section 304, EPCRA does not apply to the transportation of EPCRA section 313 chemicals. Section 201 of CEPA 1999 requires that, when an environmental emergency occurs for any of the substances on the list established on Schedule 1 under the Environmental Emergency Regulations, any person who owns or has the charge, management or control of the substance immediately before the emergency shall, as soon as possible, notify an enforcement … The definition of manufacturing in 40 CFR Section 372.3 states that, ‘manufacture also applies to a toxic chemical that is produced coincidentally during the manufacture, processing, otherwise use or disposal of another chemical or mixture of chemicals, including a toxic chemical that is separated from that other chemical or mixture of chemicals as a byproduct...’ Are the toxic chemicals that are removed from the natural gas coincidentally manufactured, and hence subject to threshold determination under EPCRA section 313?The removal and destruction of an EPCRA section 313 toxic chemical from a fuel before it is used by a facility is not considered an activity that falls under the definition of manufacturing, processing or otherwise use. This is an “otherwise use” activity. The motor vehicle exemption does not include all motor vehicles in any use at the facility. The federal facility has processed the EPCRA section 313 chemicals in the fuel because these vehicles are not based at the facility and are going back to other facilities. First, some regulations and definitions to understand… The Part 5 rules, Spillage of Oil and Polluting Materials, are promulgated pursuant to Part 31, Exemptions 2.C. Why don't libraries smell like bookstores?

Washington, DC 20590 Regardless of where the aircraft is based, EPA encourages federal facilities to consider the scale of the activity and the quantity of EPCRA section 313 chemicals used and consider taking the leadership option outlined in the Executive Order by not taking the motor vehicle maintenance exemption. The federal facility, therefore, should count the amount of the EPCRA section 313 chemicals in fuels towards the processing threshold when making threshold determinations and release and other waste management activities for EPCRA section 313 reporting.

diesel fuel spill reportable quantity Spill Reporting Table by States The spill reporting requirements at the state level are summarized here based information available from the state agencies’ websites. General Questions Fuel; Releases (Released); Waste; Waste Management Activities 586. The refueling of the aircraft in this situation would be exempt under the motor vehicle maintenance exemption. Therefore, the combustion of EPCRA section 313 chemicals contained in fuel that occurs in a motor vehicle engine is not considered a reportable energy recovery method on the Form R report.